Gruber says: "...the idea that administrators of Mastodon/Fediverse instances should pledge to preemptively block Facebook’s imminent Twitter-like ActivityPub service (purportedly named Threads) strikes me as petty and deliberately insular. ... to me this feels like convicting Facebook of a pre-crime."

To me, this take feels obtuse to the point of intention - or at least self-parody. Smells a bit like the whole "paradox of tolerance" folks like to shop around in debates.

Surely you can't possibly be unaware that Meta (née Facebook) already has a rich history of acting badly, that many folks switched to alternatives like Mastodon as a response to that, and many now express wariness & outright revulsion to that same bad actor wandering into a new party?

My dear sweet summer child, don't be a doofus.

https://daringfireball.net/linked/2023/06/19/not-that-kind-of-open

Not That Kind of ‘Open’

Link to: https://fedipact.online/

Daring Fireball
@lmorchard my (bitter) heuristic is that anytime someone says "The whole point of X is", where X is something even slightly social in aspect, you know they're not really being serious in their analysis. because, like, what, there's *one* purpose? that everyone agrees on, do they? pull the other one it has federated bells on
@lmorchard ope wope you already said that sorry https://hackers.town/@lmorchard/110573436726909218 🙈
Les Orchard (@[email protected])

Content warning: re: mastodon meta meta; gruber takes

hackers.town