RozinanteThere is no moral high ground for Reddit as it seeks to capitalise on user data | John Naughton
finnMonied interests have no morals
chatgeepeeteereddit should be paying us
The greedy always forget their riches came from other people.
llamaOh you built this community through your own time moderating, posting, upvoting and commenting? Cool we're gonna sell it to Vanguard for a few billy and pocket the profits! And, here's a list of approved content you're allowed to post now. Hard pass bro nobody cares about your IPO when we built your company.
Look, u/spez has been very clear about this, he’s not threatening anyone, he is just ensuring we only talk about Rampart.
You know for the users.
Sir_DigbyHe only cares about money. Fuck u/spez
That is pretty much the gist of it. Reddit profited off the free labor of its users. Now they are disrespecting them. That is not going to end well.
ArugulaZEvery time Paint Hufferman opens his mouth I want to down an IPA. I think I'm going to die of alcohol poisoning.
Dick JusticeSteve Huffman's a twat. Change my mind.
I will not.
HOW?? That's just an indisputable fact.
YOU'RE CHEATING
You ask the impossible
Since twat is slang for a vagina, that's easy: He lacks the warmth and depth.
Challenge not accepted.
vaguerantI know it's an opinion piece, but it's always kind of funny to see a word like "shitstorm" pop up in a credible news source.
GreenPlasticSushiGrassSo this is a real shitstorm – and one that, for a change, does not involve Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg.
LOL!
does not involve Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg
RemindMe! 3 weeks
(has anyone buillt a remindmebot for lemmy yet)
Actually surprising Elon hasn’t already “fixed it” with a few tweets
Ooh, there should be a Request A Bot community. Maybe there's peeps out there that just looove creating bots and know how to do it.
I'm after a bot to post AFL games to the @afl magazine when new AFL games start. I tried making it myself, but i absolutely suck at programming. If anyone is interested please let me know :)
A shame the article doesn't mention alternatives such as kbin or lemmy
TempizSpez is just trying to get that bag and run.
parrot-partyHe already did that once when he sold the company. He's trying to double dip on the bag now.
i saw a spez quote, one of the sickest things i've ever read, about how people are sharing things on reddit, especially in mental health / recovery spaces, "that they wouldn't even share with a therapist", and it sure is a fucking travesty that that hasn't been properly harvested and monetized
this guy should be put in a fucking padded room
567PrimeMoverThe more shit I hear come out of his mouth the more I’m disgusted that I ever used reddit. Aaron Swartz must be spinning in his grave
Unfortunately, I feel like Swartz would be spinning for a LOT of things that Web 2.0 turned out to be and propagate. We don't even blink at the idea of personal data being shared across unknown anonymous networks. It's a matter of "whatev's, they're welcome to find out what porn I like".
Like remember when that Will Smith movie "Enemy of the State" came out and although it's way over the top, it was totally on point in principle on how vulnerable we are in networks overseen by anonymous government entities and private companies.
Now we fucking applaud hundred-millionaires becoming billionaires for capitalizing on the internet stew we all threw our goods in for fun research, and internet community
BlackCoffeeWhat!? Can you link to the quote?
That's far too kind. He should be in a room with cinder block walls and a metal toilet.
Most normla CEO.
Huffman claims it's about things like LLM training that uses the API, as if it isn't possible to validate apps that want to use the API and only issue keys for approved apps. This could save third party apps while preventing bad actors from gaining access to the data without scraping the site.
No, if bad actors were the problem then the solution would be much different.
RomanRoyIt was always so funny redditors saying things villanizing Meta, Apple or Amazon while thinking Reddit was so special
Even Google said "don't be evil." Once upon a time.
mrmanagerThis Steve guy sounds like a classic asshole to me. Every article is a wtf moment to read.
So this is interesting, think of Google, Meta, Amazon, Apple. Their top goal is to use your user data to target you with ads and ultimately have you purchase a product or service. The better the return on ad spend the more advertisers spend on ads. It's actually a misconception that these companies directly sell user data, in fact it's in their best interest that they be the only one with your user data to give them an edge over their competitors in the ad business.
Reddit, on the other hand, has openly admitted to wanting to sell user created content through their API. I get the sentiment I guess, AI is being trained off their site, so they should get paid right? But AI isn't being trained off Reddit's thought, creativity, or intelligence, that belongs to the users, all Reddit owns is the servers and the UI. This honestly makes me more uncomfortable than targeted ads, because there's no circular dependency or even arguable benefit to the users here, it's one corporation taking your thought and selling it directly to another so they can both profit and build a tool that'll mostly be used by other corporations to automate and profit. It's all just another scam to get money out of our pockets.
The house always wins.
Reddit’s terrible UI is what started this mess. The third parties own the best UIs and they’re all fucking off.
DING DING DING! Finally, someone chimes in with the correct answer. Content on Reddit is created by the users. Users provide it for free, and Paint Hufferman exploits it for profit. Users get nothing in return, not even control over their own subreddits.
Disagree. Those users gave it freely to Reddit under the user agreement with them, which in turn allows them to use it basically however they please, including sub licensing. No one gave other companies permission to do so.
TLDR: read the things you agree to, next time
Yeah, you're probably right about the legal details of it. But what's written in legal texts doesn't necessarily align with what is morally acceptable. I interpret the article as an opinion piece about who has the moral high ground, and it certainly isn't Huffman. That guy has no moral compass.