@jsj
First, Nvidia GPU. This is really the big one.
Second, better right click touchpad.
Third, unlocked BIOS and OS without notarization requirements.
Fourth, ext4 is *much* faster than APFS.
Fifth, RGB lighting (if you're into that.)
Also, I like the key feel better, but that's personal.
At least now we have fkeys/escape back; the touchbar years were pain.
Macs have longer battery life if you idle, but running heavy loads, they're about the same. (Unreal Editor etc)
That may very well be true!
But I need the performance today.
Tomorrow? Might be RISC V rather than ARM, we just don't know!
Apple has optimized browsing and video watching very very well, which are basically idle operations. They have great battery life for that.
Once you actually need the full out throughput, it looks different.
And if you need CUDA, Apple has nothing, which seems like a pretty glaring miss...
@StompyRobot @kragil This is ultimately why I decided a big desktop and a "big" macbook were the way to go. I've got my Ryzen+Nvidia setup for when I need the muscle, and I've got my Mac for pretty much everything else. Especially with the benefits of containerization, for my workflows it's pretty easy to move things around.
I do think with a few more years we may yet find Apple delivering Silicon capable of competing with CUDA-accelerated workflows, but they'd have to justify to everyone else why they'd bother when there's no server application for Metal.