Yup! We identify invariants using variation and vice versa. π€
https://3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2014/07/science-is-symmetry.html
by Yohan J. John Attitudes toward science in the public sphere occupy an interesting spectrum. At one extreme there are the cheerleaders β those who seem to think that science is the disembodied spirit of progress itself, and will usher us into a brave new world of technological transcendence, in which we will merge withβ¦
Not completely sure. I think all invariants are invariants to/for consciousness, so all dimensions we measure or infer are ultimately dimensions of consciousness. There is also a sort of invariance paradox related to the mind that I allude to at the end of that essay.
Where does the value judgment come in? In the choice of what to observe in the first place?
Right. And arguably this capacity is already implied in the concepts of observation and detection. Comparison relies on the "dialectic" of similarity and difference, which is the another way of saying that comparison is about invariants and variation (or equivalently, symmetries and transformations).
Yup! I make some related points here. (Very likely I have already shared this with you.)
This essay was originally posted on April 21, 2014 at 3 Quarks Daily. No one knows exactly how life began, but a pivotal chapter in the story was the formation of the first single-celled organism ββ¦