@Bam it's the maga talking point on the bird site. I made the mistake of trying to explain why the "sock" case was completely irrelevant. The replies have ruined my morning.
@Bam here's the actual case...https://casetext.com/case/judicial-watch-inc-v-natl-archives-records-admin anyone with a very basic understanding of how laws work* can immediately see that it's about a different issue entirely.
*so apparently no MAGA