From a live tweet of the proceedings around the lawyer caught using ChatGPT:

"I thought ChatGPT was a search engine".

It is NOT a search engine. Nor, by the way are the version of it included in Bing or Google's Bard.

Language model-driven chatbots are not suitable for information access.

>>

Honestly, this lawyer is actually lucky, bc he is working within a system that was able to catch his misstep.

When MSFT, GOOG & others present their chatbots as a replacement for search, they are setting people up for similar fails, typically in much less regulated spaces.

>>

Say it with me as many times as it takes to make the lesson stick: Chatbots are not a suitable replacement for search engines.

https://dair-community.social/@emilymbender/109570353001872254

Emily M. Bender (she/her) (@[email protected])

Chatbots are not a good replacement for search engines https://iai.tv/articles/all-knowing-machines-are-a-fantasy-auid-2334

Distributed AI Research Community

@emilymbender

Even search engines are not search engines. At best they are selective web crawlers, that offer a biased search of their local database of outdated webpages. Then show sponsored links like “Buy supporting cases at amazon”, then popular pages that contain some of the search terms and sometimes the correct search result on page three.

@Life_is @emilymbender
*SIGH* but webcrawlers are cheap once they’re running, and maintaining a database that will answer semantic queries about locations on the web is probably very expensive (I doubt anyone knows for sure just what the cost would be if we had one). And we all know what a profit-driven tech corporation will choose to do given those alternatives.