Doing some research and came across this image. For those not aware, curb cuts were first installed en masse after the large number of injured veterans came back from WWII. #accessibility

Image credit: https://sketchplanations.com/the-curb-cut-effect

The curb-cut effect

The curb-cut effect illustrates how when we design to benefit disadvantaged or vulnerable groups we end up helping society as a whole. Angela Glover Blackwell explains how campaigning by students with disabilities in Berkeley in the early 1970s led to adding curb cuts to the Berkeley sidewalks to make access easier for those in wheelchairs. Yet it wasn't just people in wheelchairs that it helped. Curb cuts also made life easier for people pushing children in strollers, people using trolleys for deliveries, people pulling a suitcase, those wheeling bikes or on skateboards, and it also helps save lives by guiding people to cross at safe locations. Another example is adding closed captioning to TV that helps anyone watch in a noisy bar, a waiting room, or watching an airline safety video. Or a classic example of universal design in the OXO Good Grips range originally made to be comfortable for holding a peeler even if you have arthritis. It's also a useful analogy for "how laws and programs designed to benefit vulnerable groups, such as the disabled or people of color, often end up benefiting all," (PolicyLink) whether that be increasing broadband access, improving public transport or taking cuts out of curbs. Here's a short, fun video of Gary Karp explaining the curb-cut effect. Thanks to my patron Quintin Balsdon for sharing it with me.

Sketchplanations

@somcak
My blind elderly mum has had two falls due to the transition section between road level section and normal kerb section.

She is learning to stay away from the ramps or use the centre section.
But that learning may not last.

These things look to have nett benefits to the community.
And that comes at a cost to some.

@skua That's what I've been finding from the comments here. That by creating accessibility for some, it detracts from the safety of some others. I'm not sure there's a perfect solution that will truly serve all.

@somcak
Thanks for the OP.
And your approach.

Discussing this stuff is valuable I think, having people thinking about design and understanding that it has effects and can be changed.
#Design

@skua You're welcome. I'm a librarian and in my work try to make the library I'm at a safe place by making it accessible to all. In designing for 1 group it inevitably makes it easier for others, but there's always the chance that another group is overlooked.

These are the kinds of conversations we need to have in order to move society forward to be more equitable. Everyone needs to be included in these discussions, IMO.

@somcak
I'm reading about how design has happened both intentionally and accidentally on the cultural scale.
The beginnings of our patriarchy:
https://aus.social/@KayleenGnwmythr/110471103478835515

And #TheDawnOfEverything which looks at how protean cultures can be..

Kerbs, tin-openers, tomorrow a culture that adequately factors in climate change?

Understanding ourselves as users of designs, critics and appreciators of design and designers of things look like good steps towards co-designing a sustainable future.

Kayleen Gnwmythr (@[email protected])

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230525-how-did-patriarchy-actually-begin?utm_source=Nature+Briefing&utm_campaign=4943fc99ad-briefing-dy-20230601&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c9dfd39373-4943fc99ad-47830664 “ Rather than beginning in the family, then, history points instead to patriarchy beginning with those in power in the first states. Demands from the top filtered down into the family, forcing ruptures in the most basic human relationships, even those between parents and their children. It sowed distrust between those whom people might otherwise turn to for love and support. No longer were people living for themselves and those closest to them. Now, they were living in the interests of the patriarchal state. … The lasting psychological damage of the patriarchal state was to make its gendered order appear normal, even natural, in the same way that class and racial oppression have historically been framed as natural by those in power. Those social norms became today's gender stereotypes, including the idea that women are universally caring and nurturing and that men are all naturally violent and suited to war. By deliberately confining people to narrow gender roles, patriarchy disadvantaged not just women, but also many men. Its intention was only ever to serve those at the very top: society's elites.” #Patriarchy #OriginsOfPatriarchy #Elites

Aus.Social
@skua interesting read, thanks!