At the risk of coming off like I'm only interested in one thing, there is a fascinating, I think unintentional, reveal in Matthew Parris's column on woke (it's paywalled but te:dr, he basically equivalises anti-trans and pro-trans fringes, cheers Janice Turner but calls for respect for trans people, makes a plea for the beleaguered centre). But look at what he says about that pro-trans fringe
'Can you remember any of their names?', he asks rhetorically. Well, no: me neither. But if there were this army he describes, getting spotlight and airtime, running nebulous organisations, making a living from their trans allegiance, we'd be able to Google them, presumably? If there were a pro-trans equivalent to Janice Turner, writing a weekly column about all the bad things anti-trans activists had done, we'd have heard of them.
He's implicitly admitting this army doesn't exist, while simultaneously bemoaning that it has trivialised and toxified public debate. You know, I like the guy! But this is silly!
@zoesqwilliams Matthew actively sought me out in 1995 when I was chairing a fringe meeting at the Conservative Party Conference in Blackpool that year. The next day he wrote a generous column for his sketch in the Times saying that folks should listen to people like me. What happened to him in the intervening 28 years eh?
@zoesqwilliams My TL;DR of your snapshot is “people are in this for the money; there can’t be much money in it”. Shame he doesn’t apply that question to the other side where there really does appear to be a ready supply oh Christian Nationalist wonga for anyone getting attention for the anti-trans cause. If I was marking his journalism it wouldn’t even get an F.
@christineburns this is so interesting. Weird bit where he said we should all weigh you though - and he says _youre_ not a slick copywriter! 😂