Still, I couldn’t help but notice that while many respondents focused on techniques, none engaged the ethical question. Is it ethically okay for professors to flood illicit websites with course disinformation to suss out cheaters? Is disinformation AI’s kryptonite?

https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/blogs/confessions-community-college-dean/2023/06/02/cheating-traps-large-classes-and

Cheating traps, large classes and workarounds

Some techniques, but the core issue remains.

Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs

@deandad I love this follow up. " I don’t have an easy answer for maintaining the economies of scale of arena-size classes while preventing cheating."

As one of the people who brought up the scale issue, thank you for trying to think of a solution. I'm pretty sure this is a case where CCs and other teaching focused institutions will do better because they aren't based on scale and TA armies.

It means CCs will be less likely to use automated-punitive measures and anti-neurodivergent practices.

@narney @deandad So, hypothesis: as places offering arena-size classes continue to deteriorate in the quality of learning likely obtained by graduates, elite graduate programs & employers will continue to recruit from them rather than from CCs & RPUs with small classes & better pedagogies because what they cared about was always pedigree rather than learning anyway.
@mmlarthur @deandad sounds plausible. Especially as long as most rankings are primarily direct and indirect measures of reputation rather than quality.