Me: I won't discuss business in a room with an Alexa, because Amazon is my business competitor and they eavesdrop.

Various other folks:  

Today: Amazon to pay fine for eavesdropping. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/01/1179381126/amazon-alexa-ring-settlement

@mwl Basically Alexa does not eavesdrop, audio goes to the cloud only after the keyword is detected, and is only preserved if your Alexa settings say so.

The Ring stuff is another matter though.

@kfet @mwl

You say this, but what evidence do you have that they are correctly following their own rules?

Part of this lawsuit includes evidence from the FTC that Amazon was violating their own terms and rules. So why do you think that they're only violating the rules for Ring but not for Alexa?

Wouldn't it be safer to assume that if Ring was violating rules that everyone at Amazon was doing it?

@gatesvp @mwl Oh I don’t have evidence either way! But Alexa eavesdropping is not what any of this points to. That’d be a pretty big claim, which is what got me curious :)

@kfet @mwl This is all about your security posture.

We know that Amazon has the capacity to record lots of conversations. Amazons TOS might tell us that they're not going to, but clearly the TOS don't really matter.

If you're taking a proactive security stance, then you assume that people who can do things are doing things. Especially when the cost of violating rules is so low.

You can take a different stance. But don't act shocked when new evidence emerges.

@gatesvp @mwl It is not just TOS, there are internal processes and safeguards (technical or not), which got reviewed by FTC apparently (according to the article), and did not result in eavesdropping accusations. Take that as you wish.

I do get the sec posture stance, this thread is about evidence, of which there is not much 🤷‍♂️