Being forced to pay to host a link is just not how the internet should or does work.

For example, this (https://www.axios.com/2023/06/01/meta-california-pull-news-threat) article talks about and links to Google and Meta, so it should have to pay them with this logic.

Meta threatens to pull news from its apps in California

History suggests that it's not an empty threat.

Axios

@IcyShark

Publishers that don't want their websites showing up in Google searches can already add a noindex to their metadata (or robots.txt for us amateurs) Presumably Meta could honor that too. Add a nofollow to go nuclear.

Where I draw the line is the current trend to provide "answers" instead of just links, pushing publishers further down and off the first page or two. This is antithetical to responsible search.

@olavf I think robots / noondex needs to be respected by tools when they are learning too.
@IcyShark
At a minimum. A discussion should be had about opt-in and what websites gain (or lose) by doing so.