In 1843, an election in Salisbury, Connecticut was won by just one vote. The result proved controversial, because one of the voters was an intersex person. This is the story of Levi Suydam.

A blanket content warning applies to this thread about anti-intersex discrimination, body policing, and gender policing.

Levi Suydam was a 23 year old who presented himself to the town's selectmen - the electors - with the characteristics required to vote: he was a man, and he owned property. But due to his appearance, he wasn't permitted a vote unless he was subject to medical examinations.

Suydam was first examined, before the election, by Dr William Barry. Barry's examination found that Suydam had an imperforate penis, a scrotum and a testicle on one side. On this basis, he declared Suydam male.

However, a second doctor, who supported the opposing party objected. Dr Ticknor examined Suydam on election day. His findings corroborated Dr Barry's - he, too, agreed that Suydam was male.

@vagina_museum: In other words, Suydam was examined by the appellant's doctor on one side, and the respondent's doctor on the other side, and doctors of both sides insisted that the decision was obvious, only their obvious decisions were radically incompatible with each other.