Lawyer cites fake cases invented by ChatGPT, judge is not amused
Legal Twitter is having tremendous fun right now reviewing the latest documents from the case Mata v. Avianca, Inc. (1:22-cv-01461). Here’s a neat summary: So, wait. They file a brief …
@simon I think the explanation that ChatGPT improved its warnings between March and now is most compelling—I don’t think someone who so incompetently used ChatGPT is going to suddenly be able to fake ChatGPT logs convincingly.