Janel Comeauwhen John Lennon told me to imagine no possessions I just don't think he was envisioning a world where everything in my life is available only through a subscription-based model because the costs of personal property have been intentionally placed beyond my reach
ArneBab@VeryBadLlama this hits hard 🙂
… though I’m pretty sure "for corporate control you must subscribe for temporary access" is close to the maximum of possession—just not for *you*.
No possessions would mean that the corp cannot prevent you from just *having* what you need without paying them.
No possessions takes away the power of possession. Only subscription *maximizes* the power of possession.
…sorry for being so serious. Stallman already warned of this 13 years ago. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/what-does-that-server-really-serve/
