literally the only correct update Nintendo could've released for the 3DS was one which opened up the firmware at least a little more, and/or removed restrictions to playing games (I'm almost sure that there are still cross-region restrictions, and so removing them would be the correct option)

When a device is past its end of its lifecycle like that you don't lock it down more, you give people the tools to still re-use it

You're just making more E-waste otherwise

Literal Jesus fucking Christ

I wish large influential bodies like the EU would actually go as far as to make this law; once a product is no longer supported, an update should be released that allows full access to its boot components, to allow consumers to be able to develop or flash custom firmware for it at any time

No computer chip is sacred enough to demand full industrial secrecy, especially when you're selling those chips to consumers, that's not secrecy, that's artificial scarcity, and in some ways, planned obsolescence

All of this wastes the abilities and capacities of the high-tech fabs we've built to churn out chips, the only EOL destination it sees is a dispassionate throw into a garbage dump, literally the most wasteful you could ever be with a high-energy product like this

Not to mention the incredible disservice and apathy that does to the sourcing of the materials, which often come at high cost, and not just money

Literally everything about this makes me angry

@ShadowJonathan This is unrealistic for a couple reasons. Firstly, a product going out of support doesn’t mean that all the chips it contains are out of support too. Some of those chips (think eInk display controllers, WiFi/Bluetooth chips, GSM modems, DRM chips etc) almost always come from third-party companies. Those chips have their own firmware, and it wouldn’t be easy to legally define what exactly needs to be unlocked. The reality is that those third-party companies are, for better or for worse, extremely protective of their IP (and sometimes legally forbidden from unlocking their chips, due to radio regulations for example), so some of those companies would probably disallow selling their chips in the EU market. Secondly, the reason why a lot of devices go out of support is because the companies making them don't exist any more, and then there's nobody to release the update.

@miki let me put it like this:

i dont care.

i dont care if they're going to "have trouble" complying to such a rule. fuck them.

hiding behind third-party chips is not an excuse.

when devices go out of production and are not supported anymore, they should be opened up, no matter how many exclusivity contracts the company has made, because that just gives them an out.

capitalism is not an excuse.

@ShadowJonathan @miki the bigger argument here is, that companies won't move unless there is such regulation. They'll figure it out, because they want to stay in business and make big bucks.
@karolherbst @miki @ShadowJonathan Agreed. But I have to say it really is a shame that consumers as a whole are not wise enough to drive this. If consumers prioritized ethics above stupid esoteric factors like how much storage a device has, consumers would move the market in a better direction. But we’re all screwed b/c consumers are pushovers.
@koherecoWatchdog @karolherbst @ShadowJonathan Maybe most consumers just have different priorities than you do. That doesn’t mean they’re stupid, they just don’t care about the thinks you personally want them to care about.

@miki @koherecoWatchdog @ShadowJonathan which is totally fine, but that's why we _require_ regulation so that we organize certain things to minimize the damage we as consumers or humanity as a whole do.

Relying on "the market" for "things just getting perfect" is on the other hand stupid, same as "but the people don't care about this".

We should have politics so they explain why doing unpopular things in order to achieve higher goals is critical (like protecting our planet).

@karolherbst @ShadowJonathan @miki Indeed. Countless consumers readily admit to not having self-control. I can’t tell you how many respond to “stop driving a car… #fuckCars” with “the oil/car industry should be regulated more… the gov should have designed my city better… it’s not on me to relocate to a cyclable city”, etc.

@koherecoWatchdog @karolherbst @ShadowJonathan @miki Tbh it doesn't help that there are like... 3 cities that are cycleable without it requiring being at least a bit suicidal in my country.

That bumps up the cost a lot (in other words the poor & precariat are fucked, we have very little public housing).

SFH zoning & #CarCentric development has been an unmitigated disaster.

If like me you can just work remotely then that's good, but otherwise you're mostly out of luck.