Do you have a source for that?
It would explain a lot, and i want to be able to tell people more authoritatively than "I read it on Twitter"
https://twitter.com/markstuartdavis/status/1658318786691493888
asking here because i somewhat deliberately avoid checking my notifications on twitter
“@CKellyUAP Journal of International Medical Research. US$120 fee to have an article published. 100% acceptance rate. They don't reject ANY article submitted.”
thanks
it looks like that 100% might not be based on a very large sample size?
and it's not on the naughty list?
https://beallslist.net/
as far as i can tell, i think it's just a mediocre low impact open access journal.
The study used ivermectin in combination with an antibiotic that works well on secondary infections, so the ivermectin itself might have done nothing.
there's a #CommunityNote on it saying that, but i already came to the same conclusion from the paper before i saw the note.
https://twitter.com/i/birdwatch/t/1658266909006262272
or
https://twitter.com/i/communitynotes/t/1658266909006262272
I'm not sure if these URLs are SUPPOSED to work to show hidden notes, but they do, but only on browser that's logged in to a twitter account, not on the ap or in if you're not logged in to twitter.
Kirt in Queensland
Mark Davis
kirt