I'm looking for examples of UX/interface design where:

* users started using a feature in a way that wasn't intended (can be for good or for ill)
* the product team responded by removing the feature entirely

Also very interested in interfaces where there is an obvious feature that users would want/need that's not provided, and that feature is obviously not provided because it's against the interests of the company who makes the software.

Can anyone think of examples which fit?

@shauna Facebook. They had an API which let you access information about the logged in user and their friends. This was a good thing, it made Facebook less competitive, made it easier to start new social networks and kickstart from Facebook’s already existing social graph, allowed for third-party, alternative interfaces to Facebook ((such as for accessibility) and overall let users build tools that augmented Facebook in whatever ways they wanted. Then the Cambridge Analytica PR disaster happened, they basically took the data of consenting and non consenting users alike, mostly by having funny quizzes and such which required you to log in with Facebook, and then (falsely) claimed that they could use this data to influence elections. Facebook had to react and closed all the APIs down, which was a win for privacy, but made Facebook into even more of a monopolist than it already was.