#GoogleIO revealed the two weirdest features as a pair.

1. Give a short summary and Google will draft an e-mail for you based on it. You can even click "elaborate" and it will make the e-mail longer.

2. When opening an e-mail, Gmail can summarize the entire thing for you so you don't have to read all of it.

Does everyone realize how fucking bizarre this is?

Both people in the conversation want to work with directness and brevity, and Google is doing textual steganography in the middle.

@rodhilton Proposal: use these two, but the other way round, on normal emails as a form of lossless data compression.
@stecks @rodhilton I seriously doubt it’d be anywhere close to lossless. It’d be fascinating to see how many times you could go back and forth before it drifts away from whatever the point was
@ttyRazor @stecks @rodhilton
We could test this now using two different LLMs. Compressing-expanding song lyrics should yield some interesting creations

@ttyRazor @stecks @rodhilton

Trouble with trying this with BingChat is that it recognizes from which song the lyrics originated, and regurgitates the memorized summary for the entire song.

Yet, asking BingChat to write a song using its own summary as the prompt yields something that is altogether very different - at least it won't attract a copyright lawsuit from Ed Sheeran

@ttyRazor @stecks @rodhilton

Tried this with the abstract to "An aperiodic monotile" by David Smith et al.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10798

Bing Chat's one sentence summary:
"a solution to a longstanding problem of finding an aperiodic monotile or “Einstein” by exhibiting a continuum of combinatorially equivalent aperiodic polygons."

Then asked for an informational paragraph with that as prompt:

An aperiodic monotile

A longstanding open problem asks for an aperiodic monotile, also known as an "einstein": a shape that admits tilings of the plane, but never periodic tilings. We answer this problem for topological disk tiles by exhibiting a continuum of combinatorially equivalent aperiodic polygons. We first show that a representative example, the "hat" polykite, can form clusters called "metatiles", for which substitution rules can be defined. Because the metatiles admit tilings of the plane, so too does the hat. We then prove that generic members of our continuum of polygons are aperiodic, through a new kind of geometric incommensurability argument. Separately, we give a combinatorial, computer-assisted proof that the hat must form hierarchical -- and hence aperiodic -- tilings.

arXiv.org