What does “good” coverage of AI mean to you? I wrote about how the disparate views that very smart people have about existential risk are making it hard to calibrate how to cover advancements in artificial intelligence.
https://www.platformer.news/p/why-im-having-trouble-covering-ai
@caseynewton You might find this summary page from Chapman useful, charting a middle course on AI issues. Among other things in there: "In fact, artificial intelligence is something of a red herring. It is not intelligence that is dangerous; it is power. AI is risky only inasmuch as it creates new pools of power. We should aim for ways to ameliorate that risk instead."
Casey Newton
INVISV