I wrote about a paper that was rejected from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS) because it was a poor fit with the journal. This rejection was treated as a scandal in the NYT and Wall St. Journal, revealing much about how certain anti-woke arguments gain traction via the opinion pages, regardless of their merits.
https://donmoynihan.substack.com/p/pamela-paul-and-pnas-envy
Pamela Paul and PNAS Envy

The self-appointed defenders of academic merit can't persuade their peers, but have friends in high places

Can We Still Govern?
@donmoyn You gotta wonder if all of this hoopla was the point. They knew PNAS would reject them. They didn’t even really try anywhere else except JoCI, a journal we are now all aware of and talking about.