I’ve recently learned of a different way of limiting corporate travel, and I think it’s brilliant.

Every company travel policy I’d heard of until yesterday has been a variation on the same theme:

There’s an annual a travel budget. Management may or may not have priority and there may be limitations on who can travel together, but in the end the true limit is the amount of money in the budget.

The policy I learned of yesterday is almost, but not quite, unlike the others. The budget isn’t about money. It’s about CO2 emissions. Each department gets a specific amount of CO2 emissions for travel for the year.

The implications are interesting:

Travel within Europe has become train first as a natural consequence. Intercontinental travel has been reduced by a significant amount.

It’s an absolutely amazing policy and it should be the standard corporate travel policy everywhere.

@taf @troberts I’ve been lobbying for this for a while. Because of where we are (Australia) to get anywhere else means flying. If we can’t take the train, we have to reduce travel and when we do get on a plane, we should try to do more than one thing. Flying across the world to present to nine people in the breakfast slot in a mega conference? Flying to a meeting that could be done by other means? Nope, or only if bundled with other useful things. It’s about thinking far more carefully about what justifies the carbon budget.

For academia, this means institutions need to stop awarding career points for bad habits.

@kate @taf @troberts Especially if you are in universities, this Young Academy of Scotland pledge has some thoughtful points on travel in a short document. ➡️ https://www.youngacademyofscotland.org.uk/our-work/sustainable/yas-sustainable-business-travel-pledge/
YAS Sustainable Business Travel Pledge - Young Academy of Scotland

Young Academy of Scotland