I'm in the waiting room for a #mammogram and I know a few people are scared of those because they don't know what to expect there so I thought I'd take you along for the ride to spread a little #breastCancerAwareness
I'm in an advanced #breastCancer screening program. It's mostly for carriers of the #BRCA gene mutation. I don't have that but since the murder boob incident happened when I was way younger than the average patient and I'm not the first patient in my family, they took me too.
It means yearly screenings consisting of a mammogram, an ultrasound and an MRT. My US was cancelled this year due to idk reasons and my MRT is in two weeks, so today is only squishy time.
It will be my fifth mammogram, I think.
That's a bit out of the ordinary, because mammograms are not often done on younger patients. The higher tissue density makes them a less reliable diagnostic tool, especially if you have never breastfed.

This gets me curious @MlleSophiePofie, can you clarify?

I can see that higher tissue density would make diagnosis via X-ray more difficult; is it less reliable than other diagnostic tools for these cancer masses?

As for "have never breastfed", what is it about (I assume) having produced milk in the past, that makes diagnosis for cancer masses more reliable?

@bignose well a mammogram is an x-ray, so in denser tissue the cancer is harder to make out. And breastfeeding makes the tissue less dense 🤷🏼‍♀️

@MlleSophiePofie

Ah, so you weren't comparing different diagnostic tools (which I inferred from "makes it a less reliable diagnostic tool"); you meant that the same diagnostic tool (X-ray) is less reliable on breast tissue than on other tissue?

> And breastfeeding makes the tissue less dense

That one's total news to me, thanks.

@bignose I'm not entirely sure about that. It makes it less reliable on denser tissue, that I know. Also less reliable than an MRT afaik