WGA is bargaining to block use of their written work to train AI. (ht @harikunzru)
This is a smart move. Brief 🧵:
WGA is bargaining to block use of their written work to train AI. (ht @harikunzru)
This is a smart move. Brief 🧵:
We've already seen tons of examples of of AI-generated writing, art, and music made to sound or look similar to known human creators.
(Honestly IMO the tech is not quite there yet. Often what you get is a pale imitation. But tech is always improving!)
@tiffanycli amazing. I expected something like this to start happening but I did not expect it so soon.
Question: one way OpenAI et al try to evade this whole thing is by leaning into the "well it was made public on Teh Intertubes and we just scraped it 🤷♀️" defense. Who will be / should be liable if a script gets published on the open Web, and then sucked into an LLM training set?
Also, many everyday tools (office suites, for example) start integrating "AI". Similar question as above?
OpenAI are trying to evade those things, but it doesn't mean that they have. We are seeing pushback on many fronts.
Samsung has already banned employees from using the tools after a leak of code.
And there's an ongoing class action suit against the image generators.
@rysiek @tiffanycli honestly, I think we'll start seeing the first big fights when people start publishing movies featuring Disney characters "tweaked" by AI.
It's going to take money on multiple sides of this issue to actually resolve it and it's going to take a few years for that to happen.