I think it is interesting and says something about tech in general that even Elon understood he had to hire rocket scientists and car manufacturing engineers and neuroscientists for those projects but he doesn't appear to have hired a single expert in communication or social dynamics when taking over Twitter, the same appears to be true for every other newly founded social network where I have taken a look at the leadership.

There is a very specific sort of thing here that I don't have language for but I have noticed. People who work with things respect other people with expertise in how to work on things.

Often they do not see skills with people as real unless they are deeply abstracted and not really about people anymore but the things that make up people, eg neuroscience.

@Vrimj agreed (and I also don't have the language for it). Also people who work in tech often devalue skills of working on non-tech things *and* skills of working with people. After all at the end of the day it's all just 1s and 0s right? 😂

@jdp23

Ohh digitalist is a decent working label, I have heard the ones and zeros thing too.

It is like they think the idea that you can apply your discipline's norms and models to the world in a really broad way is somehow unique or uniquely productive in computer science.

@Vrimj digitalist is a good label, thanks! Although I realize you were originally talking about something that's more ... physicalist, I guess.

@jdp23

Yeah, but Objectivist is already taken :)

@Vrimj if the randian shoe fits ...

@jdp23

Ironic that this is an architect and novelist that gets respect isn't it.