Jeff Jarvis
Well, this is utterly meaningless and worthless. Now the Post is doing the bidding of the Court's corrupt arm....
Alito thinks he knows who Dobbs leaker is — and says it’s not a conservative https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/28/alito-leaker-dobbs-wsj/
Alito thinks he knows who Dobbs leaker is — and says it’s not a conservative

The leak of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization draft opinion rocked the Supreme Court and its tradition of secrecy involving unreleased opinions.

The Washington Post
Apr 29, 2023 at 10:43amWeb
Show threadJeff JarvisApr 29, 2023
And again: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/28/supreme-court-ethics-legislation-misguided/
Why Supreme Court ‘ethics’ legislation would do more harm than good

Foisting a compliance bureaucracy on the justices has a sheen of ethical idealism, but this is ruthless politics, targeting a conservative court.

The Washington Post
Show threadNeo-Athenian EmpireApr 29, 2023
@jeffjarvis The on going campaign to undermine the legitimacy of the court is being waged from inside the house.
Show threadJeff konradApr 29, 2023

@jeffjarvis

It was Alito.

Show threadLG MediaApr 29, 2023
@jeffjarvis a whistleblower is a whistleblower regardless of affiliation. Whoever did it saw something questionable which is why it was leaked.
Show threadRichard RobbinsApr 29, 2023
@jeffjarvis Adam Liptak did the same article. Should an unfounded, unspoken allegation like this be treated as news? It’s giving Alito an incontestable way to slime his opponents. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/28/us/alito-supreme-court-abortion-leak.html
Alito Says He Has ‘Pretty Good Idea’ Who Leaked Supreme Court Abortion Ruling

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal’s opinion pages, the justice rejected the theory that the leak had come from the right.

The New York Times
Show threadJesseApr 29, 2023
@rich1 @jeffjarvis
Show threadMichael ☕️Apr 29, 2023
@rich1 @jeffjarvis
More writers who think "journalism" is just printing whatever comes out of the mouth of a public figure.
Show threadTormod HalvorsenApr 29, 2023

@rich1 @jeffjarvis

The leaker could simply come clean and confess. As there are no ethical standards in place, nor any consequences for any actions, including bribery, I don't see why not.

Show threadPaulAlanLevyApr 29, 2023
@jeffjarvis "I have in my hand a list of liberal leakers at the Supreme Court"