I think it depends on why you're on SocMed.
For good, thoughtful conversation outside of your normal bubble, this is excellent.
For supporting yourself as an artist/creative, it is less good in terms of numbers, and because of hostility as opposed to support from randoms.
For maintaining a career in the public eye? Terrible, you earn the enmity of the media by being here, free from ads and popularity algorithms.
Everyone has to choose their own path.
And if Bluesky uses ads it will tolerate as many Nazis and bots as legally possible because that's the job of corporations.
I lay out an analysis of the economic drivers here:
https://mastodon.ie/@Homebrewandhacking/110270420198121286
My tolerance for such is zero but again these things vary.
I've been reading and listening to stuff about how social media works. Axiom 1: Services must be paid for == There's no such thing as a free launch. Axiom 2: For profits always want more money. From 1, we know that some shrug their shoulders about surveillance capitalism and accept that ads pay for things. From 2, we know that more eyeballs on ads = more money, therefore more people = money = good 1/T #SocialMedia #Bluesky #AttentionEconomy #Bots #Fascism #SurveillanceCapitalism