I've written that "guys" is not gender-neutral. Apparently Gen Z agrees. New poll (N=1,500) finds >50% of respondents (ages 18-26) are opposed to using guys to refer to men and women at work. Only 30% were in favor of guys as a catchall.
https://www.newsweek.com/generation-z-calling-men-women-guys-work-poll-1797105
Gen Z Feel Strongly About Calling People 'Guys' at Work

More than 50 percent of young adults believe it's not OK to refer to males and females as "guys," according to exclusive research for Newsweek.

Newsweek
Here's my "guys" Fast Company article with lots of gender-neutral alternatives.
https://www.fastcompany.com/90629391/guys-is-not-gender-neutral-lets-stop-using-it-like-it-is
@amydiehl Come on, y'all. We can do better.

@amydiehl
Thank you for this. Very useful

You changed a random internet stranger's habits today.

For other usages such as “hey / hi / hello guys,” substitute “guys” with:

all
everyone / everybody
people
folks
team
colleagues
comrades
squad
friends
pals
peeps
party people
lovely people
beautiful humans
Or just say “hey,” “hi,” or “hello” without attaching any other word

@amydiehl I love "you lot", haha! My co-worker calls us all "dumplings".
@amydiehl my favorite illustration of the non-neutral nature of the term is when someone says, "So, how many guys have you slept with?" 🔥

@K3n_5s @amydiehl While true, it's also not really how language works, taking words in isolation or other context and inferring their general meaning from that isn't the way to go about things.

The point still stands though. I do use it as a neutral form in some friend groups... just like I use "gals" as a neutral form, alternating "gals", "sis", "guys" and "folx". But only this context makes "guys" neutral or even explicitly "femme".

@amydiehl The comments on the Newsweek page are embarrassing. "I've always said it and no one has ever complained!" 🙄
@amydiehl The Goonies are going to be so disappointed.
@amydiehl yeah but. Language is descriptive, not prescriptive. Using Guys in a neutral sense helps /make/ the word more inclusive. Discouraging this use seems... counterproductive?