A quick history lesson. From 1940-1980:
•Wealthiest paid 70-94% marginal tax
•0 of them went broke from taxation
•0 of them left USA
•All remained exceedingly wealthy
•Manufacturing boomed
•The middle class was 62% of US economy (It's now 40% post 'trickle down scamenomics)
•We had the strongest middle class growth in US History

Let's do that again. Stop protecting billionaires. Start taxing them.
#TaxBillionaires

@QasimRashid that is actually not true. Perhaps the posted rate were that high but they all played the same games they do no. Virtually none of them paid that much. To fix this we need flat taxes with no deductions. If you have to have your commie “progressive tax” you could set like 4 or 5 tiers of flat rates and we can all just file our taxes on a post card like most of the free world.
@comeandtakeit @QasimRashid Flat taxes are inherently a burden on the poor. Marginal rates are meant to be levied not on total income (gross or net) but on *disposable* income. And since the wealthy have a considerably higher percentage of that, then they should be taxed more.
@textualdeviance @QasimRashid They inherently pay more in that 20% of $50MM is much more than 20% of $50,000. In my comment I am yielding to the current desire to have a “progressive tax.” I am just saying do away with the silly deductions and have four fixed rates that change as your income increases. So HHI < $50K is no tax, HHI 50k to 200k is 20%, 200k-500k is 25% and over $500K is 27%. No games. No loopholes. You just pay your percentage based on your HHI an move on. Easy peasy

@comeandtakeit You're missing the point.

Imagine it this way: If you make $10/hour, it takes you 30 minutes to afford a $5 gallon of milk.

If you make $1,000/hour, it takes less than a second.

Even if you're buying expensive organic milk straight from a boutique dairy, the price per gallon isn't going to scale that high. Wealthy people have *so much more* disposable income, it makes sense to tax them more on the extra amounts.

@textualdeviance I feel like you’re arguing just to argue. I ceded to point and and going along with a “progressive tax” even though I don’t like it. I’m just saying have like 4 or five rates and do away with deductions otherwise you can raise the top rate to 90% and you still ain’t getting it because the loopholes are still there.
@comeandtakeit Deductions are how you determine the amount of disposable income, though. I get that the tax code is complicated, and it does need to be streamlined. But not in a way that will put more burden on workers and thereby screw the whole economy.