Why: temp rise under 1.5C

What: zero emissions by 2050; capture CO2

How to get to zero: vote and donate to climate+ pols, electric or no car, trains not planes, clean electricity or home solar, low or no meat, buy climate+

How to capture: plant 500 billion trees

@evan home solar or buy "farm" solar? Surely in some cases the farm is more efficient- how do i know if it beats using my roof?
@drewp I'd put that under "buying clean electricity"
@drewp "efficiency" isn't the most compelling problem — building out capacity fast enough is. So I'd say whatever solar you can get built fastest is best. For some people, that will be community solar. For some (like me), it's putting it on your roof. For some places, it's changing laws so that solar farms can even be built. In reality, we have to do all the things as fast as possible @evan
@evan and by „planting“ we do mean #FMNR 😍
@evan 2050 is far far too late, we needed to be cooling the Earth by now ! Greenland is near enough certain to completely melt. Watch Jason Box'es YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrdMOFXuXlc
Prof. Jason Box - Zombie Ice and unforeseen sea level rise

YouTube

@evan
Climate Restoration Roadmap 2024 'Earth Shot'

https://youtu.be/LE2QuuvR7Lo

Climate Restoration Roadmap 2024

YouTube
Honestly, at this point the we need people to start blowing up datacenters besides everything else you mention if we want to have any shot of remaining under 2°.



1.5° is impossible already: we are already past it, as of September 2024

@javi all electronic usage accounts for about 2-3% of global GHG emissions, including blockchain, AI, your phone and my laptop. It's great to develop lower-power devices and power them with renewables, but we need these devices to coordinate and communicate; getting rid of them is a terrible way to fight climate change.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/09/210910121715.htm

Emissions from computing and ICT could be worse than previously thought

Researchers claim that previous calculations of ICT's share of global greenhouse emissions, estimated at 1.8-2.8%, likely fall short of the sector's real climate impact as they only show a partial picture. The researchers point out that some of these prior estimates do not account for the full life-cycle and supply chain of ICT products and infrastructure -- such as: the energy expended in manufacturing the products and equipment; the carbon cost associated with all of their components and the operational carbon footprint of the companies behind them; the energy consumed when using the equipment; and also their disposal after they have fulfilled their purpose.

ScienceDaily

@javi 1.5C is not impossible; we can go over and come back down. It's a really bad scenario, though.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/10/09/overshoot-climate-targets-one-point-five/

Scientists have said that we can cool the planet back down. Now they’re not sure it will be so easy.

Scientists and world leaders have said we can “overshoot” and then return to our climate targets. But much damage will be done.

The Washington Post
Oh of course, bombing petrol refineries would be much better, I just used data centers because we are net engineers talking on a social network. What I mean is that we need serious, and I'm afraid forced, economic disruption happening ASAP
@evan investment emissions from the world’s 50 richest are about 4100x the “average” person’s emissions, entirely separate from private jet/yacht travel which emits about 1500x that of commercial rail travel. you gotta take away the toys.