Beginning in 10 minutes: a Congressional hearing focused on the SEC, where Chairman Gary Gensler will face scrutiny over the commission's activities involving the crypto industry (among other things).

Livetweet thread :🧵 (I'll use the hashtag #SEChearing for anyone who wants to mute).

Hearing info: https://financialservices.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=408690
Direct YouTube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmipafFCli0

Hearing Entitled: Oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission | Financial Services Committee

Chairman McHenry (R-NC) begins, and launches right in on the topic of digital assets. Accuses Gensler of "refus[ing] to provide clarity" on digital assets and how they fall under securities regulations, and "regulating by enforcement".

McHenry also says that Gensler's leadership of the SEC is "driving innovation overseas and endangering American competitiveness".
He accuses Gensler of doing too much regulation, introducing too many rules.

#SEChearing

One theme to look out for today will be crypto advocates such as McHenry on the one hand criticizing Gensler for doing too much regulation ("stifling innovation"), while on the other accusing him of not doing enough (with respect to FTX).

#SEChearing

Rep. Waters (D-CA) is up now. She's annoyed that the hearing is (in her view) motivated by Republicans' promises to "do a big number" on Gensler and the SEC, rather than focusing on issues she feels are more important (debt crisis, banking collapses, etc.)

#SEChearing

Rep. Wagner (R-MO) up now, giving her part of the Republican view that the Gensler and the SEC haven't been sufficiently responsive to Congressional inquiries, and is causing "death by a thousand cuts" to US capital markets.

#SEChearing

Rep. Sherman (D-CA) joins Waters in thanking Gensler for his work thus far, and for showing strong action against "crypto bros". Sherman is possibly the most outspoken crypto critic on the floor. This is likely to be fairly split among party lines, though there are exceptions.

#SEChearing

Gensler says he thinks the most transformative innovations will be in AI, not in crypto. Talks about roboadvisers...

#SEChearing

Rep McHenry (R-NC) launches right in, asking about disagreement among regulators over whether ether is a security or a commodity. States that assets cannot be both securities and commodities. Gensler corrects McHenry that securities are commodities, but excluded commodities.

#SEChearing

McHenry is demanding Gensler express his view on whether ETH is a security or a commodity. Gensler won't give a specific answer on ETH, wants only to provide his view on the general regime, wanting to avoid to pre-judge. McHenry accuses him of prejudging in the case of Bitcoin.

#SEChearing

McHenry asks Gensler to agree that there is a "lack of clarity" around crypto regulations. Gensler: "I think the clarity is there, the law is clear. There's a group of individuals who are relying on..." (McHenry interrupts).
Waters (D-CA) is up, asks Gensler to give his definition of securities that McHenry wouldn't allow him to finish.

Waters asks if Gensler believes the SEC has the authority necessary to oversee the crypto industry, or if he agrees with the crypto industry line that they need a NEW regulatory framework. Gensler says that he believes they have the authority they need.

#SEChearing

"I've never seen a field that's so non-compliant with laws" in his 40 years, says Gensler. "This is an unfortunately, for the investing public, non-compliant field."

#SEChearing

Hill (R-AR) asks if Gensler supports Congress drafting a regulatory framework for stablecoins. Gensler says yes, if Congress were to ensure they addressed safety and soundness without undermining capital markets, and without undermining SEC's and CFTC's ability to go after fraud.

#SEChearing

Hill asked several other questions about the Consolidated Audit Trail, treasury regulations, etc. I won't cover the non-crypto conversations in as much detail since I'm less familiar with the background.

#SEChearing

Velázquez (D-NY) is asking about bank collapses, asking what the SEC has done with regards to Dodd-Frank, insider stock trading around the time of bank collapses.

#SEChearing

Rep. Sessions (R-TX) is challenging Gensler on his statement that "my views are my own" at the beginning of the hearing. Gensler is required to say that.

#SEChearing

Rep. Sherman (D-CA) is pushing for legislation that would find that all intangible investment assets (including crypto) are securities, which would remove the token-by-token battles we're seeing.

#SEChearing

Sherman is also pushing for a redefinition of "accredited investor" that isn't based on an individual's wealth, but rather on that individual's knowledge, and would limit how much of their assets they could put into one basket.

#SEChearing

Rep. Lynch (D-MA): "My friends on the other side of the aisle seem to be bemoaning a lack of regulatory clarity, but then in the same breath criticize the SEC's rulemaking efforts that arguably would provide that clarity they desire."

#SEChearing

Lynch cites large corpus of SEC decisions and guidance around things like crypto risk to banking industry. "There's a fair amount of guidance out there, and clarity, it's just not the clarity that the crypto industry wants."

#SEChearing

Gensler: "It's not a matter of a lack of clarity. I think [crypto] is a field that, in the main, has built up around non-compliance and that's their business model. They have chosen, even though it's not the law, to be non-compliant."

#SEChearing

Rep. Posey (R-FL) asks if Gensler had concerns about FTX prior to the collapse. Gensler says he's had a general concern about the field, its general non-compliance, and commingling of exchange vs. trading functions.

#SEChearing

Posey is asking Gensler about the time frame in which SEC investigations are announced. Gensler says that investigations are kept private until charges or settlement to try to protect the integrity of the investigation and the privacy of those involved. Posey: "Sad to hear that."

#SEChearing

@molly0xfff But that's how they've always done it. Why is that "sad"?