The under is a different story. On the one hand you know Kerr has some defensive adjustments up his sleeve. Stop fouling, for one. Perhaps a box and one for Fox? More minutes for Wiggs?
Or on offense, more commitment to driving and drawing fouls, which will force the Kings to take the ball out of the net more often. Surest way to slow the break!
On the other hand, it was truly remarkable that the first game went so far over when neither team’s offense was truly efficient.
And Mike Brown’s commitment to running is truly maniacal and eye popping. And he might be right! It was Wiggins and Dray who wore down in the first game - not the Kings young buck.
It was Kerr who caved by going big in crunchtime rather than force Brown to match up small with the death unit!
I am wavering in my commitment to the under, which means I can’t honestly recommend it. Feels like gambling to me, and I bet to earn, not gamble.
You have my analysis, do with it as you will.