Ever since November, I’ve told everyone who would listen that continuing to use Twitter helps Fascism.

Certain people said that statement was “extremist and alienating”.

But now it turns out that Twitter is deliberately amplifying Russian propaganda. And Russia is, in fact, a Fascist regime.

It’s time you all realize the stakes of your social media use.

https://weaponizedspaces.substack.com/p/kremlin-twitter-accounts-get-a-boost

Kremlin Twitter accounts get a boost thanks to Elon Musk

Russia is reaping the benefits of Twitter under Musk's leadership.

Weaponized

I know that Twitter is where your friends are and you’ve spent 15 years building your social graph on that service.

But is that a good reason to aid and abet the spread of Russian propaganda?

Even if you believe Russia is a far off concern, this isn’t true—it’s patently obvious that Russia is influencing domestic Fascism as well.

The likes of Candace Owens don’t appear in a vacuum. They are clearly influenced by the Kremlin.

“But I’m mocking all the Fascism on Twitter, or blocking it whenever I see it!”

Doesn’t matter. Elon Musk controls the algorithm. As we’ve already seen, he dictates what is seen and unseen.

Anyone who speaks out against his agenda can find themselves talking to a proverbial wall. Or at least brought out as a punching bag when the need arises.

And your blocks don’t matter if Elon really wants to force Twitter to see something.

Your continued presence on Twitter helps no one.

Look, I get it.

Nobody likes to be told that they’re helping the bad guys. Especially when they’ve spent their entire lives self-identifying as liberals or progressives.

You’re on the side of human rights, not the Nazis, right?

Well, this is where actions speak louder than words.

It’s time to stop with the hot takes and dunks.

It’s time to log out of Twitter and never come back.

I also understand—and empathize—that people often have no choice and must use Twitter.

If the choice is between making rent and eviction, I get it.

But that’s not everyone. If you’re privileged enough to leave Twitter, it’s your duty to log off forever.

That’s how you can thwart the spread of Fascism.

@atomicpoet If only it were that simple. You see, the people I engage with on Twitter are just as anti-fascist as I am.

Let's compare that with the people I engage with here, after five months of daily use.

Oh, nobody much engages with me here. So, I guess I don't have any data for comparison.

The folks who post here do seem very nice though - notwithstanding their near total lack of reciprocity whenever I try to pleasantly engage with them.

So, based on my experience, it looks like my options here are to be a broadcaster (like the folks who never engage with me), a fan (who praises broadcasters), a troll (who causes trouble to get engagement), or a lurker (who reads but is totally invisible.)

Ideally, I would become a fan, and heap adulation on all the broadcasters here. However, becoming a lurker is more my style. So please be advised that I typically read and enjoy your posts when they come my way.

Over and out.

@KansasGrant If people are still on Twitter, they are helping the cause of Fascism.
@atomicpoet I respect your opinion, but it is only that.
Kremlin Twitter accounts get a boost thanks to Elon Musk

Russia is reaping the benefits of Twitter under Musk's leadership.

Weaponized

@atomicpoet My.opinon differs about the "supporting" part. I provided a rationale for why being on Twitter might be a way to actually fight fascism - which you did not refute.

As I'm sure you're aware, many people on Twitter believe that they should "stay and fight" rather than "cede the global public square to the fascists."

I don't personally hold that view but I think it's just as defensible as yours that by staying on Twitter, one is supporting fascism.

As I stated previously, your argument oversimplifies a complex issue. In my opinion.

@KansasGrant @atomicpoet I don't understand how one can 'stay and fight' when control is decided solely by who bought the company. This isn't a physical public space. It's access to a data shared data store owned and controlled by the those with the keys.

To be absolutely clear, the position that you defend is that if enough people 'fight' for twitter then the ownership will cede and change direction when they 'win' and it will some how remain that way as the other side 'loses'

@skotchygut @atomicpoet I don't actually hold that position myself. But I believe it's defensible, as follows:

- Like it or not, Twitter is the de factor "global public square". Mastodon may eventually get there but it's currently far from it.
- Although Musk has elevated fascist voices, he has not explicitly silenced anti-fascists: we can still make our voices there heard. (Not so if anti-fascists were explicitly silenced.)
- Like most things in life, there are plusses and minuses. The good of "Stay and fight" can reasonably be deemed to outweigh the harm of sharing the global public square with fascists.
- Musk and/or his investors have a profit motive to keep Twitter viable as a business. Therefore, there is a constraint on his apparently pro-fascist management of the platform.

@KansasGrant @skotchygut Could have fooled me about his profit motive. Elon Musk made his dog the CEO, changed Twitter’s office sign to “Titter”, and auto-responds to press inquiries with 💩.

Either he’s exceptionally bad at making Twitter profitable, or he’s not motivated by it at all.

@atomicpoet @skotchygut I've considered both possibilities myself over the last several months, and have concluded that both are plausible, and that we have no way to know at this point which is correct.

That said, my own hunch is that it's some combination of the two.

@KansasGrant @atomicpoet I think that is a reasonable conclusion. Having been using the internet since the 90s and got my start on social media in the IRC days I can confidently say that social networks grow, bloom, and die. All of them. They must be constantly renewed by their members. No leadership can prevent this. I just don't understand why reasonable community members would chose to continue to invest their limited time in one rich person's personal fiefdom.
@atomicpoet He’s running it into the ground at the behest of his handlers