@ProPublica broke the story of Justice Thomas' blatant corruption. In a follow-up after Thomas claimed he'd done nothing wrong, the news org quoted his BS and then, citing people who know what they're talking about, refuted the BS.

https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-response-trips-legal-experts-harlan-crow

Contrast this with the Washington Post's coverage: A story uncritically amplifying the BS, and a less-prominent sidebar labeled a "fact check".

ProPublica did it right. The Post did it wrong.

Clarence Thomas Defends Undisclosed “Family Trips” With GOP Megadonor. Here Are the Facts.

In response to a ProPublica report, Thomas explained why he did not disclose lavish travel provided by billionaire Harlan Crow. But legal experts maintain the justice was required to make these disclosures.

ProPublica
@dangillmor @ProPublica Why are we surprised? ProPublica is not owned by corporate, @washingtonpost IS. Shame on you #washingtonpost for whitewashing #clarencethomas ’s BLATANT corruption. If only we had a glimpse of his terrible character BEFORE he was installed on the bench. #anitahillwasright @potus