A polite reminder to people on here who like to proclaim:

"At this point if you're still on Twitter you are [some variant of horrible person]"

If you are a small creator - artist, writer, whatever - then right now Mastodon DOES NOT deliver equivalent reach-based income. People do not tip as much and the lack of QT significantly damages creator reach.

Being able to forsake income is a privilege. Your options are not someone else's options. Please be open-minded to that.

At some point soon, time allowing, I want to write something about the differences between creator reach, interactions and revenue on Twitter Vs Mastodon. I'm aware that as a digital strategist AND ALSO a creator with a platform on both I am relatively uniquely placed to do so.

But trust me, the spaces are not equivalent. Perfectly valid design decisions here do have negative impacts as a small creator dependent on reach.

There are absolutely ways that Mastodon could correct this. The biggest being:

1) Supporting, rather than being hostile to, threading
2) OPT IN for "I will let my quotes be tweeted"

Both would have a SIGNIFICANT positive impact for small creators.

There are also perfectly valid community reasons not to do both. But if, as a federated platform, it decides that's not in its best interest than it needs to be acknowledged that it's also a choice not to make Mastodon small creator revenue friendly

While it DOESN'T support those things though, which is a conscious platform choice, do try to remember that the opportunity for your favourite creator - artist, writer, maker, whatever - to switch to here as their primarily presence are limited.

And for it to be their ONLY presence simply isn't viable, for most.

I appreciate this isn't a thing people are openly saying. I appreciate I am a "first wave" Twitter exile here.

But I like to think my behaviour and posting here has shown how much I've enjoyed and embraced this platform.

And part of that is wanting to see others like me, but more reliant on marginal creator income, find a home here too.

And that's just not possible for so many small creators on Twitter I love right now, who would make Mastodon sing even more than it does already.

@garius I mean, I see where you're coming from, but if my income relied on the continuing existence of Twitter then wow, I would be panicking hard right now.

That's more important than the moralistic thing you see here sometimes I think.

@tomw @garius

Lots of marginalized creators will be looking for day jobs because of Twitter's implosion, and they know it. Lots of panic and despair in our community.

And denial, of course. Don't forget denial!

@mwl @tomw well that really just adds to my point.

I know a LOT of small creators who ARE panicking. And the fact they don't see Mastodon as a viable solo lifeboat should be seen as evidence that it isn't.

And therefore they shouldn't be judged for that, if it's the result of active (and reasonable in context) design decisions here.

@garius @mwl @tomw I deeply, deeply hope this will teach is what chokepoint capitalism is & why it can't be allowed to continue.

It's like if we'd built an entire economy around a global string of prime location strip malls where everyone both works & shops, and then one day a new owner turned the entire chain into a literal Nazi clubhouses, but nobody had any choice but to keep working/shopping there...