A polite reminder to people on here who like to proclaim:

"At this point if you're still on Twitter you are [some variant of horrible person]"

If you are a small creator - artist, writer, whatever - then right now Mastodon DOES NOT deliver equivalent reach-based income. People do not tip as much and the lack of QT significantly damages creator reach.

Being able to forsake income is a privilege. Your options are not someone else's options. Please be open-minded to that.

@garius what if I’m happier here because no one is trying to push “content” at me? It’s a social network, not a parasocial network.

@ardouglass then good for you.

AS LONG AS you're not also criticising people who are still on Twitter - because they require a platform that does deliver those options - for staying there.

As I make clear multiple times in the replies. I'm not criticising. It's a valid design choice.

I'm simply saying that those who wish to castigate creators for not migrating and closing Twitter accounts need to accept there's a reason why Mastodon doesn't fill the same gap for them.

@garius
Mastodon people: our network is great, we designed it to minimise interactions and virality.

People who need to maximise interactions and virality: uhhhh... That's sounds not great.

MP: you're a bad person!

P: ...
@ardouglass

@iinavpov I don’t care about those people and I don’t expect or even necessarily want them to be here. We should be allowed to have social places online that don’t ultimately turn into a sales platform.