Many people are asking, "Why are journalists staying on Twitter?"

The short answer: social status.

As much as certain journalists say that social status doesn't matter, it does matter.

The reason journalists were drawn to Twitter is because of that damned Blue Check.

Now I've always contended that the Blue Check is a terrible feature, and not something the Fediverse should emulate:

https://blog.atomicpoet.org/YdJMHV8ASc2E_loByi0vRQ#

Nevertheless, Blue Check status is why journalists still stay on Twitter.

Why the Blue Check is a terrible feature - HedgeDoc

A few journalistic entities like @TexasObserver and @damemagazine have discovered that there's an audience for their work on the Fediverse.

And individual journalists like @jeffjarvis have become esteemed members of the community here.

But to most journalists, when they see the Fediverse, they see that no Blue Check status is given out -- which means they have to start from the bottom like everyone else.

They don't like that.

As for why journalists find Blue Check so compelling, think about it. What's the pull for modern journalism?

It's not pay, I can tell you that much. For many nowadays, journalism pays barely above subsistence wages.

But journalism still conveys a certain amount of respectability, especially with culture.

And Twitter's Blue Check gave journalists the same respectability as politicians and rock stars.

If Twitter deemed you "notable", you got a blue check.

To be objective about Twitter is to acknowledge that it's quickly losing its cultural cachet.

What made the old Blue Check system so compelling is that no one could buy it. Twitter awarded it to you. It was an acknowledgement that you were important.

But if someone can buy the Blue Check, the Blue Check loses its value.

What's more, "legacy" Blue Checks are about to go away.

Journalists are about to lose their social status -- even if they pay.

I suspect that once the legacy Blue Check goes away, there will be many journalists who will still do everything they can to keep Twitter relevant.

Yes, the stats are a lie, and "reach" should be taken with a grain of salt. Few people click to articles from Twitter. Elon Musk, himself, views journalists with contempt.

And yet, many journalists will continue to use Twitter because giving up perceived social status is scary.

Personally, I believe journalism is still an important profession.

But I also think there's a big difference between investigative journalism that holds the rich and powerful to account, and bootlickers who will do anything for access to the rich and powerful.

More and more, Twitter is becoming the domain of bootlickers.

Nothing proves this more than the 💩 emoji that Twitter auto-replies to press inquiries.

There will come a day -- probably not now -- where journalists will be *forced* to leave Twitter.

That is, if they want to maintain their social status.

Now I'm not a journalist. I'm just a tech worker who's viewing this farce from the outside.

There's not a day that goes by where I don't wonder what kind of indignities journalists will continue to suffer in order to keep Twitter a going concern.

@atomicpoet I think #MedMastodon #IDMastodon #Epidemiology #Microbiology #RxMastodon will also regret it. Much to build on here that IS sustainable. Much that can be done to provide good information, in anticipation of pandemics, outbreaks, etc.