What's Trump's Indictment is Missing

The Manhattan DA released the indictment today after Trump’s arraignment, but we still don’t know enough to evaluate the prosecution

Rolling Stone
@Popehat I think I heard somewhere (possibly your podcast) that in New York the prosecution only has to show intent to commit the secondary crime to prove felony falsification of documents. Is that not correct?
@jbrewer_jera Not on Serious Trouble I think. Need to show intent to defraud too.
@Popehat Here’s the source I was thinking of. It covers New York State case law around falsifying documents, and how “intent to defraud” means something very different here than it does in federal law.
https://www.justsecurity.org/85831/the-broad-scope-of-intent-to-defraud-in-the-new-york-crime-of-falsifying-business-records/
The Broad Scope of “Intent to Defraud” in the New York Crime of Falsifying Business Records

"While there are other legal hurdles for the Manhattan DA to cross in the indictment of the former president, this element of the relevant offenses poses no obstacle..."

Just Security
@jbrewer_jera Yep. Linked in the article.

@Popehat Oops! Missed it because of the link text.

Thanks as always for your work making this stuff accessible to a lay audience.