@Strandjunker I'd call this an over-simplification, in the "not even wrong" vein.
'Journalism' covers a lot of duties, one of which is reporting pretty much anything that any public figure says, no matter how asinine. The fact they said it is news all by itself, independent of truth or decency. The public have a right to know what leaders say, however stupid.
New ANALYSIS is related, but separate. This seems to be what's being addressed here, but not all news is analysis.
@pagangod Then that's not reporting, but offering opinion. Two different things. You can do that, yes, and there is media specifically for that (op-ed), but it's not reporting. Reporting is objective and does not include opinion.
You're arguing that there should be no such thing as objective reporting.
@pagangod But that's what "reporting" IS. You're confusing reporting with opinion. Opinions can be true, but reporting must be provably factual.
I think part of your confusion may be because a lot of news-LIKE media is really much more opinion than reporting. A guy sits at a desk like a reporter would, but he's expressing opinions, and in a way that sounds a bit news-like. But that's not actually reporting.