@godpod Until the language of the second amendment is updated to clearly state what it means, nothing will change.
I got into a debate with a friend on FB about this and after asking him to define “well regulated militia” he came around to admitting that he sees the 2A as there in case enough gun owners ever feel the need to overthrow the US government, for whatever reason they deem valid.
Try it. Simply suggest that the language is too vague and needs updating. When they-
@godpod - inevitably say “it’s perfectly clear,” ask them to define pretty much any of the terms, like “militia” or even “necessary,” and I’m almost positive you’ll get them to admit they believe they will need to blow away government agents someday.
When he defined the “militia” as “a citizen” I rewrote the amendment replacing that term with his definition showing that he too seemed to agree that “militia” isn’t exactly the right word. So he either agreed that it was too-