@fraying Section 230 might be cast aside & something better instituted. It's also possible that servers/instances/Internet providers that ONLY provide a place for people to say stuff, NOT manipulate readers with algorithm-driven whatnot, NOT curate material, NOT scrape others' materials off the Internet & repurpose it, NOT commission their own content β might remain protected under 230, while Meta-FB-etc. are justifiably sued.
@fraying Sure. Here's the Brookings summation from Feb of the then-upcoming proceedings: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2023/01/31/the-supreme-court-takes-up-section-230/ . Here's Cornell's text of 230: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
Here's the EFF version (I loved them back in the early-mid 1990s. Guess what? It's not the early-mid 1990s anymore). https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230
Hope that's useful.