@[email protected] Regarding restricting the use of terms, in this case I think the article is a bit unfair to the trademark owner. It doesn’t appear at all that they’re saying “you can’t use the words ‘worship leader.’” Rather, they publish online media under that brand and the recipient of the cease and desist letter publishes a blog titled “Worship Leader Probs.” If the latter is monetized at all, this sounds pretty straightforward to me. Confusion seems probable…