The NYT ran an opinion piece today, "Is Working From Home Really Working?" You are smart and can probably tell from the headline alone that the piece itself is not working--and in the same way it accuses American workers--has a bad attitude
It is a fine example of muddy thinking and just embarrassingly bad writing. So it's unclear why the Times--which, btw, was a forerunner in allowing some staff to work from home about two decades ago--would publish it