Taxation is theft.
Rents are a form of tax.
Taxation is theft.
Rents are a form of tax.
I’m not sure why we’d need taxes to fund roads, since roads existed before taxes.
- Roads predate states. States are much older than either the Roman state or the medieval period. We don’t need taxes to have roads.
- States don’t tax to fund spending.
- Coercion is bad. If people have to be coerced into doing something, it’s probably not worth doing. If it is worth doing, then people will probably do it without being coerced.
- The usefulness of coercion to you is not a good justification for coercion.
Taxes don’t fund road construction, but even if they did, the existence of a benefit for you does not justify theft.
That roads many thousands of years ago were not designed for modern SUVs does not obviate the point that people in stateless societies still have roads.
Super excited to get to introduce this to you:
The idea that taxes fund things is also theoretical unless you can demonstrate it empirically. The reason MMT even exists is because you can't.
The existence of an alternative does not really having any bearing on whether taxes are theft or not.
Freedom from coercion is better. Not sure why you have such a hard time either getting behind this idea, or admitting that you believe human beings need to be coerced by a separate ruling class in order to thrive.
You either believe the coercion is justified or you don't. How do you not fit into one of those categories?
Saying that our society is built on coercion is not rhetoric. Deciding which side you're on is not a "dumb game".
Hilariously, he has blocked me.
He followed an anarchist communist and then threw a tantrum when I wrote anarchist communist things.
Me too. Too bad, I was just about to give in and spill the whole secret anarchist System Of Everything in minute detail. The new improved extra-compelling version.
Oh well.