When creating a new account we show a list of ~40 suggested follows (should be the same as explore -> for you on the web client). I'm debating just auto-selecting them (possibly with a “skip" button).

I don't want to be accused of forcing people to follow other users, but the first launch experience when not following anyone is pretty terrible.

My guess is that most will tap continue without even reading anything. So it's an auto-follow but for a good purpose...

Thoughts?

Since a few have asked. The list comes from the individual instance (mastodon.social in this case). The admin can make changes to the list, a user can opt themselves out of it. It's not separated by any kind of “category”. Outside of the two company accounts we just show what the server returns.

My gut says that anything short of having a diversely populated timeline on launch is going to cause most users to run the app once, delete it and then go complain on Twitter that Mastodon is too hard.

@paul what about multiple lists? Like “suggested by your server” plus maybe lists for tapbots pals, journalists, tech twitter exiles, or whatever you can come up with?
@raygan I don't want to get in that business. "Why is X on there but not Y, are your politics Z of center?!?!”
@paul fair! maybe there’s another “notable accounts” project you could co-opt though?

@raygan @paul I think this is an area where Mastodon needs improvement. They could allow sharing lists, so one could click an individual and see their shared lists. Follow quickly those on the list etc. This way apps don't need to curate a list of categories, it would be done naturally by people on your server.

https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/18292

Shared/Collaborative User Lists · Issue #18292 · mastodon/mastodon

Pitch Instance-bound (I'm assuming federation-wide implementation would be extremely difficult) shared user lists primarily associated with the creator's account. A rudimentary administrative privi...

GitHub
@Ciantic @paul from what I’ve heard this was an intentional omission after some people used lists to coordinate dog piles and griefing on Twitter.
@raygan @paul Naturally there should be opt-out of any public lists. How do shared lists differ from that suggested followers? If you have not ticked "Opt-out to be suggested following" it could allow being shown in public lists as well.
@Ciantic @paul i’m not saying it couldn’t be overcome, but the issue on Twitter was mostly (as I understand it) that people would create a list called something like “Libtards” and just add people to it, directing their followers to harass them without doing anything obviously banable.