we’re going to look back at how we designed the world around computers with the same regret that we look at how we’ve designed cities around cars
A City Is Not a Computer

A bold reassessment of "smart cities" that reveals what is lost when we conceive of our urban spaces as computers

A City Is Not a Computer

A bold reassessment of "smart cities" that reveals what is lost when we conceive of our urban spaces as computers

@doriantaylor @round Thanks! And yes, this is largely what my book is about :)
@shannonmattern @round one thing i think about a lot is how the people writing the code are axiologically, epistemologically, and ontologically challenged, like, facile and largely unexamined beliefs based on shaky premises in service of vacuous goals
@round I already do. Web3.0 was the tip of the iceberg for me
@round
I just read an article about how language changed in some areas because people are trying to avoid words that are disallowed on social platforms.
@rother_stuebs @round Which words? Because I can think of a few words that should rightfully be dropped from the lexicon regardless of social media.
@round Don’t think so. Cars are tools designed to do one thing only. Computers are programmable tools, they can be used to do an infinite amount of things. That’s a huge conceptual difference. But if you mean ‘social networks’, then yes, probably.
@round true, but because of the cars, we likely won't make it long enough to find out