(I say this while simultaneously holding the belief that too many p2p apps, including mine, are still too alienating to non-technical crowds. I'm striving to do better UX.
BUT, any deep change will inevitably cause the user to learn new things, and that cannot and should not be avoided)
"Make this decentralized app work just like centralized apps, from the perspective of non-technical users" is thus essentially to not teach anything new to those users, and fundamentally is a paradox that will keep the user on those centralized apps.
People MUST learn.
@staltz I absolutely agree, tho I think there’s a balancing force here too: setting expectations. Even with my extreme newness in the Manyverse, I can see that folks joining expecting “twitter” will be more confused than those expecting “facebook” (though there’s obviously considerable differences there too!)
The best expectations are set against things that *aren’t* competitors, but that’s often where it’s easiest to explain functionality. It’s so fascinating, you must be loving the challenge!
@staltz its funny blusky is being regarded as the successor when it too will apparently be decentralized with all that entails
funny thing is people understood it well enough in the IM days that eventually gave birth to twitter because there were tons of different networks that could all be used at once
@staltz and it doesn't even *have* to be harder, people are used to email addresses and phone numbers
it's just different than what centralization affords