Would be nice if there was a quicker way of saying “I am fascinated by this technology on a theoretical level, but would rather eat paper than look at the random output you generated using an off-the-shelf tool made by a shady megacorp”

@rutherford I was talking to an expert on this yesterday and he expressed a similar sentiment. AI researchers are now very busy to address the criticisms, e.g. that an LLM has no sense of purpose. So they will give it a sense of purpose. Or that they are often wrong. They will make them self-correcting. But the never stop to think about the problem of not understanding the ramifications what this thing will actually be doing when you do all that.