Here is your must-read article for the day, a profile of @emilymbender, and her efforts to deflate the ridiculous hype around large language models such as ChatGPT.

It's also about the people who are behind that hype, and about what their way of thinking has the potential to do to us.

It's worth reading all the way to the end.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/ai-artificial-intelligence-chatbots-emily-m-bender.html

@ct_bergstrom Who are the people behind the downplaying of the technology? That’s what I see much more of.

@ct_bergstrom @emilymbender Would love to see this debate. Is it available somewhere?

On the highlighted part, I think it’s both. We are not a stochastic parrot. Heck, we aren’t even our brains. But our stochastic parrot brain plays a crucial role in making us who we are.

Invited Speakers and Panels

Official website for the 2022 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

NAACL-HLT 2022
Watch lectures from the best researchers.

On-demand video platform giving you access to lectures from conferences worldwide.

Underline.io
@escapadesrpg Yeah, that was it. And yeah, the Intelligencer article didn’t really give a good summary of the points of view.
@anthony AI won't ruin journalism, they are doing it to themselves 🤦‍♂️

@escapadesrpg The article describes the singularity as “the tech fantasy that, at some point soon, the distinction between human and machine will collapse.”

Umm, no, the singularity would very much not involve machines becoming a thing even remotely close to humans.

But I’m not sure journalists are ruining journalism so much as that these sorts of ignorant, biased articles have always been part of journalism. Critical reading has always been an important part of reading all kinds of text.