Mark Riedl@mattontech That is a deeply nuanced topic. It is my belief (and belief of lawyers that I talk to) that AI content can be copyrighted, but not by the AI itself. That is, the copyright defaults back to a human, probably the prompter. In that case, it is consistent with what Gorsuch says because the liability for the content defaults back to the entity providing the inputs to the AI system. #IAmNotALawyer
@mattontech To complicate things, the US Copyright office recently came to a different conclusion, and their conclusion is inconsistent with their earlier rulings about the copyrightability of non-legal-entities (ie Gorillas that get ahold of cameras). #IAmNotALawyer