The UNESCO Open Science Recommendation was adopted by the UN member states in 2021.

Open Infra is an important part: science should use publicly/community-owned infrastructure and avoid proprietary software and platforms.

This means Open Science requires some switches, eg:

👉 Qualtrics 🔁 LimeSurvey/formr

👉 NVivo/Atlas/MaxQDA 🔁 QualCoder/ROCK

👉 Mendeley/Endnote 🔁 Zotero

👉 SPSS/SAS/STATA 🔁 jamovi/JASP/R

Who would you say share the responsibility for making these changes?

[ please boost! 🙏 ]

🏛️ Universities
37.7%
💰 Funders
30.7%
🧑‍🔬 Individual researchers
27.8%
✒️ Other, please elaborate in a reply
3.8%
Poll ended at .

@matherion

I've thought for quite a while that this should be rolled into new faculty start-up packages, at the very least.

whatever proportion is earmarked for open approaches in start-up could count towards an open match from like-minded funders

@idlestate I'm sorry, but I don't think I understand what you're saying here. Are "start-up packages" money, or instructions, or something else?